In the world of compliance and risk management, access to accurate and up-to-date information is crucial. Organizations across various industries must navigate a complex landscape of regulatory requirements, sanctions, and potential risks. To help businesses make informed decisions, compliance data comes in various tiers, each offering different levels of accuracy and coverage. To assist our clients, we delve here into the differences between the four tiers of compliance data: free government sites, professionally-managed watchlist services, global adverse media, and global ownership information.
- Government sites and open source projects: Free government sites and open source projects offer a basic level of compliance data. They are publicly accessible and provide information on sanctioned individuals and entities. While they are free, they have significant limitations. They may not be updated frequently, their coverage is restricted to specific jurisdictions, the data generally lacks context and detailed information, and the search is designed to yield the maximum number of results, not the most accurate results, making it challenging to assess the true risk associated with a particular entity and impossible to use in a commercial context where managing false positives is necessary. Additionally, there is no support or training, and regulators do not accept enterprise reliance on a free resource. These sites and projects are an excellent resource for students, academics and researchers.
- Professionally-Managed Watchlist Services: Professionally-managed watchlist services (PMWS) represent a significant step up in terms of accuracy, reliability, coverage and speed. These services are typically provided by specialized companies that curate and maintain global databases of politically exposed persons (PEPs), entries subject to sanctions, export controls and other risk factors. These databases are regularly updated, ensuring that businesses have access to the latest information. The data is often enriched with additional details, such as aliases, IDs, dates and places of birth, relatives and known associates, providing a more holistic view of potential risks.
- Global Adverse Media: Global adverse media goes beyond lists of sanctioned individuals and entities. It involves monitoring a wide range of news sources, including newspapers, websites, and social media, to identify adverse information about organizations and individuals. This tier of compliance data helps uncover hidden risks that may not be present on official watchlists. It can include reports of legal issues, controversies, or negative public sentiment requires advanced technology and sophisticated algorithms to sift through vast amounts of unstructured data.
- Global Ownership Information: Global ownership information is the most comprehensive tier of compliance data. It focuses on understanding the ownership structures of businesses, particularly complex corporate entities and shell companies. This data helps businesses identify ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) and understand the potential risks associated with ownership chains. Access to global ownership information is critical for addressing concerns related to money laundering, fraud, and corruption.
-
Specialty Compliance Data: Specialty compliance data caters to specific, niche needs. These sources include information like shelf company lists, which identify companies available for immediate use and generally used by money launderers, or companies involved in forced labor, which highlight businesses with ethical concerns and subject to various import bans. Such data is essential for organizations with specialized compliance requirements. It allows them to address unique risks and meet regulatory demands specific to their industry or location.
The five tiers of compliance data offer varying levels of accuracy and coverage and suit different needs. Free government sites provide a starting point for researchers and journalists, but professionally-managed watchlist services are the only option for anyone concerned with legal risk. Global adverse media expands the scope to uncover hidden risks; global ownership information delves into complex ownership structures and specialty compliance data is indispensable for organizations with unique risks.
Depending on their specific needs and risk exposure, organizations must choose the appropriate tier or a combination thereof to effectively manage compliance and risk in an ever-changing global landscape. Ultimately, the choice of compliance data tier should align with an organization's commitment to due diligence and regulatory compliance.